Lignosulfonate vs EDTA Chelates for Micronutrients

Lignosulfonate vs EDTA Chelates for Micronutrients

Lignosulfonate vs EDTA Chelates for Micronutrients

EDTA forms chelates, in which a single molecule wraps a metal ion with several strong bonds; lignosulfonate forms complexes, in which a large natural polymer holds metal ions more loosely through sulfonate, carboxyl and phenolic groups. EDTA chelates are more stable in soil, especially for zinc and manganese at higher pH; lignosulfonate complexes are biodegradable, compatible with many fertiliser mixes and suited to foliar and fertigation use where very high stability is not required.

Side-by-Side Comparison

PropertyEDTA chelates (e.g. Zn-EDTA)Lignosulfonate complexes (e.g. Zn-LS)
Type of bondChelate: one ligand, several coordinating groups around the metalComplex: metal bound to sulfonate, carboxyl and phenolic groups of a polymer
Stability in soilHigher; keeps Zn and Mn in solution over a wider pH rangeLower; one study on iron found poor mobility and stability in soil at pH 7.5 compared with EDDHA
OriginSynthetic aminopolycarboxylateBy-product of sulfite pulping of wood
BiodegradabilityPoorly biodegradable; persistence in water is a known concernNatural wood-derived polymer; broken down by soil microorganisms over time, at a rate that depends on conditions
Metal content of productsSet by the chelate stoichiometry; check the data sheetDepends on the product, e.g. Zn about 10% in a Zn-LS powder (GAC-ZnLS TDS)
EU fertiliser statusChelating agents meeting CMC 1, Regulation (EU) 2019/1009Complexing agents; identified by EN 16109 in fertilisers
Typical useSoil and fertigation where strong stability is neededFoliar sprays, fertigation, liquid blends, NPK coating
Stability and soil results from the cited Frontiers in Plant Science studies; product metal contents are examples, check the actual data sheet.

What the Research Shows

The common thread: in soil, especially calcareous soil, strong synthetic chelates keep micronutrients available longer. Lignosulfonate complexes are better matched to uses where the nutrient reaches the plant quickly – foliar sprays, fertigation and liquid blends – and where biodegradability matters.

Choosing Between Them

SituationBetter fitReason
Soil application on calcareous, high-pH soilSynthetic chelate (EDTA; EDDHA for iron)Higher stability in soil
Foliar sprayEither; lignosulfonate is widely usedShort contact with soil; good compatibility and leaf coverage
Fertigation with phosphatesTest both; lignosulfonate complexes are used with polyphosphatesCompatibility depends on the blend; run a jar test
Programmes that avoid persistent synthetic chelantsLignosulfonateNatural, biodegradable carrier
Organic productionCheck the certifier listStatus depends on the standard and the specific product

Before any blend goes to the field, check physical compatibility with a jar test for lignosulfonate tank mixes.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is zinc lignosulfonate as effective as zinc EDTA?

Not in all situations. In calcareous soil, studies have found ZnEDTA more effective at supplying zinc. For foliar and fertigation use, lignosulfonate complexes are widely used and are biodegradable.

What is the difference between a chelate and a complex?

A chelate is a metal held by several bonds from one ligand molecule, such as EDTA. A complex is a looser association, such as a metal bound by groups along a lignosulfonate polymer.

Are lignosulfonate micronutrients recognised in EU fertiliser law?

EU rules distinguish chelating and complexing agents for micronutrient fertilisers. Lignosulfonates are treated as complexing agents, and EN 16109 is the standard method to identify them in fertilisers.

References

Questions about a specification, a test method or a trial: contact us or email info@greenagrochem.com.